Land-Based Art Criticism: (Un)learning Land Through Art

Author:

Bae-Dimitriadis Michelle1

Affiliation:

1. Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

AbstractThis article provides an overview of how land-based settler colonial critique can reorient art criticism and art education to expand the scope of art and art practice to critical considerations of land politics and social justice, particularly in terms of the repatriation of Indigenous lands. In particular, land-based perspectives can help to rethink place/land by offering decolonizing methods for critiquing Western works of art that address place. Art educators’ ability to understand and critique settler colonialism in art has been hindered by Eurocentric art criticism. This article seeks to reveal settler colonial imperatives and ambitions regarding land through a critical analysis of American landscape paintings and land art. This piece further examines contemporary Indigenous artists’ site-specific works through adopting decolonial, land-based inquiry. Land-based art criticism interrupts the dominant mode of art inquiry to more comprehensively analyze art associated with place/land and expand the scope of social, cultural, and political understandings of social equity.

Publisher

University of Illinois Press

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference42 articles.

1. 1. I use these terms interchangeably, as they often share views, methods, and goals. Landbased inquiry centers land as an analytic and examines its relation to both Native Americans and settlers. It is inherently associated with decolonization in its challenge and subversion of colonial systems, policies, and attitudes, particularly toward the ultimate purpose of land repatriation in the context of settler colonialism (Tuck & Yang, 2012). Settler colonial critique is a necessary method for decolonization and land-based inquiry to identify and critique sites and events impacted by settler colonial systems.

2. 2. This term refers to Indigenous peoples’ call for European settlers to return stolen land and Indigenous belongings.

3. 3. This term means a future of endless settler dominance over the land. It specifically foregrounds the erasure of Indigenous peoples and their land sovereignty in the past, present, and future.

4. 4. The term means numeric measurement of spatial patterns to quantify and capture physical dimension of urban growth and land use (Herold, Couclelis, & Clarke, 2005).

5. 5. See https://npg.si.edu/exhibition/american-origins-0.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3