Real-World Data on Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Focus on Sequences and Prognostic Factors

Author:

Santoni Matteo,Heng Daniel Y.,Bracarda Sergio,Procopio Giuseppe,Milella Michele,Porta CamilloORCID,Matrana Marc R.,Cartenì Giacomo,Crabb Simon J.ORCID,De Giorgi UgoORCID,Basso Umberto,Masini Cristina,Calabrò Fabio,Vitale Maria Giuseppa,Santini Daniele,Massari FrancescoORCID,Galli Luca,Fornarini Giuseppe,Ricotta Riccardo,Buti SebastianoORCID,Zucali PaoloORCID,Caffo OrazioORCID,Morelli Franco,Carrozza Francesco,Martignetti Angelo,Gelibter Alain,Iacovelli RobertoORCID,Mosca Alessandra,Atzori Francesco,Vau Nuno,Incorvaia Lorena,Ortega Cinzia,Scarpelli Marina,Lopez-Beltran AntonioORCID,Cheng LiangORCID,Paolucci Vittorio,Graham Jeffrey,Pierce Erin,Scagliarini Sarah,Sepe Pierangela,Verzoni Elena,Merler SaraORCID,Rizzo Mimma,Sorgentoni Giulia,Conti Alessandro,Piva Francesco,Cimadamore AlessiaORCID,Montironi RodolfoORCID,Battelli Nicola

Abstract

Cabozantinib is approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, prognostic factors are still lacking in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in RCC patients treated with second- or third-line cabozantinib. A multicenter retrospective real-world study was conducted, involving 32 worldwide centers. A total of 237 patients with histologically confirmed clear-cell and non-clear-cell RCC who received cabozantinib as second- or third-line therapy for metastatic disease were included. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-strategy failure (TTSF) using Kaplan–Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses.The median PFS and OS of cabozantinib were 7.76 months (95% CI 6.51–10.88) and 11.57 months (95% CI 10.90–not reached (NR)) as second-line and 11.38 months (95% CI 5.79–NR) and NR (95% CI 11.51–NR) as third-line therapy. The median TTSF and OS were 11.57 and 15.52 months with the sequence of cabozantinib–nivolumab and 25.64 months and NR with nivolumab–cabozantinib, respectively. The difference between these two sequences was statistically significant only in good-risk patients. In the second-line setting, hemoglobin (Hb) levels (HR= 2.39; 95% CI 1.24–4.60, p = 0.009) and IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) group (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04–2.87, p = 0.037) were associated with PFS while ECOG-PS (HR = 2.33; 95%CI, 1.16–4.69, p = 0.018) and Hb levels (HR = 3.12; 95%CI 1.18–8.26, p = 0.023) correlated with OS at multivariate analysis, while in the third-line setting, only Hb levels (HR = 2.72; 95%CI 1.04–7.09, p = 0.042) were associated with OS. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.This real-world study provides evidence on the presence of prognostic factors in RCC patients receiving cabozantinib.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3