Author:
Rizzo Mimma,Pezzicoli Gaetano,Tibollo Valentina,Premoli Andrea,Quaglini Silvana
Abstract
AbstractOver the last decades, the therapeutic armamentarium of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of tyrosin-kinase inhibitors (TKI), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and immune-combinations. RCC is heterogeneous, and even the most used validated prognostic systems, fail to describe its evolution in real-life scenarios. Our aim is to identify potential easily-accessible clinical factors and design a disease course prediction system. Medical records of 453 patients with mRCC receiving sequential systemic therapy in two high-volume oncological centres were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate and compare survival between groups. As first-line treatment 366 patients received TKI monotherapy and 64 patients received ICI, alone or in combination. The mean number of therapy lines was 2.5. A high Systemic Inflammation Index, a BMI under 25 Kg/m2, the presence of bone metastases before systemic therapy start, age over 65 years at the first diagnosis, non-clear-cell histology and sarcomatoid component were correlated with a worse OS. No significant OS difference was observed between patients receiving combination therapies and those receiving exclusively monotherapies in the treatment sequence. Our relapse prediction system based on pathological stage and histological grade was effective in predicting the time between nephrectomy and systemic treatment. Our multicentric retrospective analysis reveals additional potential prognostic factors for mRCC, not included in current validated prognostic systems, suggests a model for disease course prediction and describes the outcomes of the most common therapeutic strategies currently available.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Institute NC. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Kidney and Renal Pelvis Cancer. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/kidrp.html.
2. Santoni M, Piva F, Porta C, Bracarda S, Heng DY, Matrana MR, Grande E, Mollica V, Aurilio G, Rizzo M, Giulietti M, Montironi R, Massari F. Artificial Neural Networks as a way to predict future kidney Cancer incidence in the United States. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021;19(2):e84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 10. PMID: 33262083.
3. Moch H, Amin MB, Berney DM, et a. The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-Part A: renal, Penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2022;S0302–2838(22):02467–8.
4. Osawa T, Takeuchi A, Kojima T. et a. Overview of current and future systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 49:395–403, 2019. 2019;49:395–403.
5. Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT. Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol. 2005;174(2):466–72.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献