Affiliation:
1. Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, AB T4A 0C3, Canada
2. ACER Consulting, Guelph, ON N1G 5L3, Canada
3. Ondine Biomedical Inc., Bothell, WA 98011, USA
4. Center for Lasers and Applications, Energy and Nuclear Research Institute, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil
Abstract
The development of novel antimicrobial technologies for the food industry represents an important strategy to improve food safety. Antimicrobial photodynamic disinfection (aPDD) is a method that can inactivate microbes without the use of harsh chemicals. aPDD involves the administration of a non-toxic, light-sensitive substance, known as a photosensitizer, followed by exposure to visible light at a specific wavelength. The objective of this study was to screen the antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy of 32 food-safe pigments tested as candidate photosensitizers (PSs) against pathogenic and food-spoilage bacterial suspensions as well as biofilms grown on relevant food contact surfaces. This screening evaluated the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), and colony forming unit (CFU) reduction against Salmonella enterica, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas fragi, and Brochothrix thermosphacta. Based on multiple characteristics, including solubility and the ability to reduce the biofilms by at least 3 log10 CFU/sample, 4 out of the 32 PSs were selected for further optimization against S. enterica and MRSA, including sunset yellow, curcumin, riboflavin-5′-phosphate (R-5-P), and erythrosin B. Optimized factors included the PS concentration, irradiance, and time of light exposure. Finally, 0.1% w/v R-5-P, irradiated with a 445 nm LED at 55.5 J/cm2, yielded a “max kill” (upwards of 3 to 7 log10 CFU/sample) against S. enterica and MRSA biofilms grown on metallic food contact surfaces, proving its potential for industrial applications. Overall, the aPDD method shows substantial promise as an alternative to existing disinfection technologies used in the food processing industry.
Funder
Ondine Biomedical Inc.
Canadian Agricultural Partnership’s AgriScience Program
Reference71 articles.
1. Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States;Scharff;J. Food Prot.,2012
2. Estimates of the burden of foodborne illness in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents, circa 2006;Thomas;Foodborne Pathog. Dis.,2013
3. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens;Scallan;Emerg. Infect. Dis.,2011
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023, September 21). Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED), Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html.
5. One Health for food safety, food security, and sustainable food production;Garcia;Front. Sustain. Food Syst.,2020