Affiliation:
1. College of Music and Dance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Abstract
By analyzing students’ understanding of a certain subject’s knowledge and learning process, and evaluating their learning level, we can formulate students’ learning plans and teachers’ curricula. However, the large amount of data processing consumes a lot of manpower and time resources, which increases the burden on educators. Therefore, this study aims to use a machine learning model to build a model to evaluate students’ learning levels for art education. To improve the prediction accuracy of the model, SVM was adopted as the basic model in this study, and was combined with SSA, ISSA, and KPCA-ISSA algorithms in turn to form a composite model. Through the experimental analysis of prediction accuracy, we found that the prediction accuracy of the KPCA-ISSA-SVMM model reached the highest, at 96.7213%, while that of the SVM model was only 91.8033%. Moreover, by putting the prediction results of the four models into the confusion matrix, it can be found that with an increase in the complexity of the composite model, the probability of classification errors in model prediction gradually decreases. It can be seen from the importance experiment that the students’ achievements in target subjects (PEG) have the greatest influence on the model prediction effect, and the importance score is 9.5958. Therefore, we should pay more attention to this characteristic value when evaluating students’ learning levels.
Funder
Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education
Guangzhou Musicians Association’s “Music Culture Research” and “Special Topic on Music Education Reform in Primary and Secondary Schools” Project
2023 Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Youth Talent two-way Exchange project
Reference36 articles.
1. The Application Design of Machine Learning in Intelligent Learning Support System;Yin;Adv. Mater. Res.,2012
2. Using Sentiment Analysis to Analyze the Feedback of Students with Open-ended Questions;Leem;Stud. Humanit. Soc. Sci.,2020
3. Karakas, E., and Yondem, M.T. (2020, January 7–9). Performance-based evaluation of computational thinking skills using machine learning. Proceedings of the 2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS), İstanbul, Turkey.
4. Feng, H., and Ouyang, W. (2015, January 27). Based on the Game Theory Analysis of Student Teaching Evaluation in Chinese Universities. Proceedings of the 2015 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Society (ICSSS 2015), Bucharest, Romania.
5. Are between- and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socio-economic background? Evidence from 30 countries;Marks;Educ. Res.,2006