Abstract
Livestock production is under increasing scrutiny as a component of the food supply chain with a large impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Amidst growing calls to reduce industrial ruminant production, there is room to consider differences in meat quality and nutritional benefits of organic and/or pasture-based management systems. Access to forage, whether fresh or conserved, is a key influencing factor for meat fatty acid profile, and there is increasing evidence that pasture access is particularly beneficial for meat’s nutritional quality. These composition differences ultimately impact nutrient supply to consumers of conventional, organic and grass-fed meat. For this review, predicted fatty acid supply from three consumption scenarios were modelled: i. average UK population National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) (<128 g/week) red meat consumption, ii. red meat consumption suggested by the UK National Health Service (NHS) (<490 g/week) and iii. red meat consumption suggested by the Eat Lancet Report (<98 g/week). The results indicate average consumers would receive more of the beneficial fatty acids for human health (especially the essential omega-3, alpha-linolenic acid) from pasture-fed beef, produced either organically or conventionally.
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference133 articles.
1. Nutrition and sustainability: an emerging food policy discourse
2. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050;Alexandratos,2012
3. Climate Change 2007 Mitigation of Climate Change;Metz,2007
4. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities;Gerber,2013
5. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains–A Global Life Cycle Assessment;Opio,2013
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献