Analysis of the Experiments in the Chemistry Textbooks in terms of the Laboratory Study Goal of the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum and Comparison with the Case of Science High School

Author:

NAKİBOĞLU Canan1

Affiliation:

1. Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi

Abstract

This study aims to examine to what extent the goal of the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum for experimental studies overlaps with the acquisitions of the curriculum and to what extent upper-secondary school chemistry textbooks (high school) are prepared to meet this purpose. The study also seeks to assess the extent to which the activities in the chemistry textbooks are written to meet the four dimensions (gaining data by experimenting, inferring using data, interpretation, and generalization) of the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum. Finally, it is intended to compare this situation with the 2018 Science High School Chemistry Curriculum and determine the similarities and differences. For these purposes, the acquisitions including the experimental studies in the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum were determined at first. Then, the experiments in the 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th-grade chemistry textbooks were analyzed. Two ways were used for textbook analysis. In the first stage, it was defined to what extent the acquisitions in the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum and the experiments in the textbooks overlapped and how the experiments were distributed according to the units. In the second stage, the experiments in the textbooks were analyzed according to the four dimensions of the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum by means of a rubric. it was concluded that the acquisitions that include explanations about experimental studies are approximately 16% of the total acquisitions of the 2018 Chemistry Curriculum. Additionally, as a result of this analysis for SPSs, it is found that the experiments mostly focus on the basic SSBs, and they focus especially on “observation” and “measurement” skills.

Publisher

Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronics Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Ayas, A. (1995). Fen bilimlerinde program geliştirme ve uygulama teknikleri üzerine bir çalışma: İki çağdaş yaklaşımın değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(11), 149-155.

2. Aydın, A. (2013). Representation of science process skills in the chemistry curricula for grades 10, 11 and 12/Turkey. International journal of Education and Practice, 1(5), 51-63.

3. Aydın, A., Ayyıldız, Y., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2019). Investigation of the Gains of the 2018 Science High School Chemistry Curriculum according to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Comparison with 2018 Chemistry Curriculum. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 1186-1215.

4. Aydoğdu, B., Tatar, N., Yıldız, E., & Buldur, S. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerine yönelik bilimsel süreç becerileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(3), 292-311.

5. Ayyildiz, Y., Aydin, A., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2019). 2018 Yılı Ortaöğretim Kimya Dersi Öğretim Programı Kazanımlarının Orijinal Ve Yenilenmiş Bloom Taksonomisine Göre İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 52, 340-376.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3