Abstract
RationaleThis article analyses what impact the increase in permanent contracts observed over the course of 2022 might have had on household spending.Takeaways•In 2019, workers on permanent contracts devoted 81% (on average) of their household income to spending, compared with 72% for those on temporary contracts.•In the past, having their temporary contract converted to a permanent one has prompted households to increase their spending-to-income ratio by approximately 20% over the following two quarters.•Based on those figures, the conversion of temporary to permanent contracts observed in 2022 could have increased the spending-to-income ratio by between 0.18 and 0.24 percentage points.
Reference12 articles.
1. Anghel, Brindusa, Cristina Barceló and Ernesto Villanueva. (2019). “The household saving rate in Spain between 2007 and 2016:decomposition by population group and possible determinants”. Economic Bulletin - Banco de España, 4/2019, AnalyticalArticles. https://repositorio.bde.es/bitstream/123456789/10792/1/be1904-art34e.pdf.
2. Arellano, Manuel, Stéphane Bonhomme, Micole De Vera, Laura Hospido and Siqi Wei. (2022). “Income risk inequality: evidencefrom Spanish administrative records”. Quantitative Economics, 13(4), pp. 1747-1801.
3. Banco de España. (2022). Macroeconomic projections for Spain 2022-2025, p. 36. https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/GAP/Secciones/SalaPrensa/IntervencionesPublicas/DirectoresGenerales/economia/Arc/Fic/IIPP-2022-12-20-gavilan-en.pdf.
4. Banks, James, Richard Blundell and Agar Brugiavini. (2001). “Risk pooling, precautionary saving and consumption growth”. TheReview of Economic Studies, 68(4), pp. 757-779.
5. Barceló, Cristina, and Ernesto Villanueva. (2016). “The response of household wealth to the risk of job loss: evidence from differencesin firing costs” Labour Economics, 39, pp. 35-54.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献