Argument against Separate Writing Courses for Engineers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Argument against Separate Writing Courses for Engineers

Published:1996-07 Issue:3 Volume:122 Page:111-113
ISSN:1052-3928
Container-title:Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.

Author:

Clayton Terry¹

Affiliation:

1. Asst. Prof., Ctr. for Language and Educational Technol., Asian Inst. of Technol., Bangkok, Thailand.

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Industrial relations,Civil and Structural Engineering

Link

http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%291052-3928%281996%29122%3A3%28111%29

Reference24 articles.

1. AIT Alumni 1961–1990 employer study . (1992). Asian Inst. of Technol. (AIT) Bangkok Thailand.

2. Amyotte P. (1991). “A communications course for engineers.” Engrg. Educ. (May/June) 436–438.

3. Upgrading Written Communication: Your Firm's and your Own

4. Bridgeman B. and Carlson S. (1983). “A survey of writing and technical writing courses in engineering colleges.” Engrg. Educ. Vol. 73 110–113.

5. Buell M. Z. (1991). “As the professors see it: assignment descriptions and perceptions of international student performance in academic reading and writing ” MS thesis Ohio Univ. Athens Ohio.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessment and Characterization of Writing Exercises in Core Engineering Textbooks;Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice;2018-10

2. Integrating English Language Skills into a Marketing Research Course;Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science;2015

3. Using an English Tutor in the Engineering Classroom;Journal of Engineering Education;1998-10

4. Preparing Engineers for Management;Journal of Management in Engineering;1997-11