Abstract
Derivations under different grammar formalisms allow extraction of various dependency structures. Particularly, bilexical deep dependency structures beyond surface tree representation can be derived from linguistic analysis grounded by CCG, LFG, and HPSG. Traditionally, these dependency structures are obtained as a by-product of grammar-guided parsers. In this article, we study the alternative data-driven, transition-based approach, which has achieved great success for tree parsing, to build general dependency graphs. We integrate existing tree parsing techniques and present two new transition systems that can generate arbitrary directed graphs in an incremental manner. Statistical parsers that are competitive in both accuracy and efficiency can be built upon these transition systems. Furthermore, the heterogeneous design of transition systems yields diversity of the corresponding parsing models and thus greatly benefits parser ensemble. Concerning the disambiguation problem, we introduce two new techniques, namely, transition combination and tree approximation, to improve parsing quality. Transition combination makes every action performed by a parser significantly change configurations. Therefore, more distinct features can be extracted for statistical disambiguation. With the same goal of extracting informative features, tree approximation induces tree backbones from dependency graphs and re-uses tree parsing techniques to produce tree-related features. We conduct experiments on CCG-grounded functor–argument analysis, LFG-grounded grammatical relation analysis, and HPSG-grounded semantic dependency analysis for English and Chinese. Experiments demonstrate that data-driven models with appropriate transition systems can produce high-quality deep dependency analysis, comparable to more complex grammar-driven models. Experiments also indicate the effectiveness of the heterogeneous design of transition systems for parser ensemble, transition combination, as well as tree approximation for statistical disambiguation.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference64 articles.
1. An Incremental Algorithm for Transition-based CCG Parsing
2. Auli, Michael and Adam Lopez. 2011b. Training a log-linear parser with loss functions via softmax-margin. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 333–343, Edinburgh.
3. Bohnet, Bernd. 2010. Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 89–97, Beijing.
4. Choi, Jinho D. and Martha Palmer. 2011. Getting the most out of transition-based dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 687–692, Portland, OR.
5. Wide-Coverage Efficient Statistical Parsing with CCG and Log-Linear Models
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. FinReport: Explainable Stock Earnings Forecasting via News Factor Analyzing Model;Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024;2024-05-13
2. Hybrid embeddings for transition-based dependency parsing of free word order languages;Information Processing & Management;2023-05
3. AI for automated code updates;Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice;2022-05-21
4. AI for Automated Code Updates;2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP);2022-05
5. Comparing Knowledge-Intensive and Data-Intensive Models for English Resource Semantic Parsing;Computational Linguistics;2021-03