Author:
Medland Sarah E.,Duffy David L.,Wright Margaret J.,Geffen Gina M.,Martin Nicholas G.
Abstract
AbstractSimultaneous analysis of handedness data from 35 samples of twins (with a combined sample size of 21,127 twin pairs) found a small but significant additive genetic effect accounting for 25.47% of the variance (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.69–29.51%). No common environmental influences were detected (C = 0.00; 95% CI 0.00–7.67%), with the majority of the variance, 74.53%, explained by factors unique to the individual (95% CI 70.49–78.67%). No significant heterogeneity was observed within studies that used similar methods to assess handedness, or across studies that used different methods. At an individual level the majority of studies had insufficient power to reject a purely unique environmental model due to insufficient power to detect familial aggregation. This lack of power is seldom mentioned within studies, and has contributed to the misconception that twin studies of handedness are not informative.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference53 articles.
1. Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: The right shift theory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Annett, M. (2002). Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
3. Handedness and Mortality: A Follow-Up Study of Danish Twins Born between 1900 and 1910
4. On the Distribution of Nonrighthandedness Among Twins and Their Families
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献