Author:
Pfeifer Lena Sophie,Schmitz Judith,Schwalvenberg Maike,Güntürkün Onur,Ocklenburg Sebastian
Abstract
AbstractThe development of handedness and other form of functional asymmetries is not yet understood in its critical determinants. Early life factors (e.g., birth weight, birth order) have been discussed to contribute to individual manifestations of functional asymmetries. However, large-scale data such as the UK Biobank suggest that the variance in handedness that is explained by early life factors is minimal. Additionally, atypical handedness has been linked to clinical outcomes such as neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Against the background of this triad, the current study investigated associations between different forms of functional asymmetries and (a) early life factors as well as (b) clinical outcomes. Functional asymmetries were determined by means of a deep phenotyping approach which notably extends previous work. In our final sample of N = 598 healthy participants, the different variables were tested for associations by means of linear regression models and group comparisons (i.e., ANOVAs and Chi-squared tests). Confirming previous findings from larger cohorts with shallow phenotyping, we found that birth factors do not explain a substantial amount of variance in functional asymmetries. Likewise, functional asymmetries did not seem to have comprehensive predictive power concerning clinical outcomes in our healthy participants. Future studies may further investigate postulated relations in healthy and clinical samples while acknowledging deep phenotyping of laterality.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Daimler und Benz Stiftung
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Güntürkün, O., Ströckens, F. & Ocklenburg, S. Brain lateralization: A comparative perspective. Physiol. Rev. 100, 1019–1063 (2020).
2. Versace, E. & Vallortigara, G. Forelimb preferences in human beings and other species: Multiple models for testing hypotheses on lateralization. Front. Psychol. 6, 233 (2015).
3. Pfeifer, L. S. et al. Broadening the scope: Increasing phenotype diversity in laterality research. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 16, 1048388 (2022).
4. Frasnelli, E. et al. The bee as a model to investigate brain and behavioural asymmetries. Insects 5, 120–138 (2014).
5. Ocklenburg, S., Hirnstein, M., Beste, C. & Güntürkün, O. Lateralization and cognitive systems. Front. Psychol. 5, 1143 (2014).