Abstract
Archaeological evidence documents apparent depopulation of the Hohokam region of Southern Arizona at the end of the Classic period (A.D. 1150-1450). Major population centers were no longer occupied, and many distinctive material culture traits associated with the Hohokam tradition seem to disappear. Proposed explanations include migration, dispersion of the population into less archaeologically visible settlements, and wholesale population decline. The latter hypothesis is attractive partly because of a seminal study of paleodemography and health at the Classic-period site of Pueblo Grande in the Phoenix Basin. That study suggested that the population was not sustainable due to very low life expectancy, a very high dependency ratio of juveniles to adults, and other indicators of biological stress. A hazards analysis of the published demographic data reveals life expectancy at birth in the expected range for prehistoric populations with no evidence of a dependency crisis. Population decline at the end of the Classic period is more likely explained by reduced fertility than by increased mortality. Birth rates are sensitive to cultural and economic forces, and we should look beyond health factors in trying to account for the disappearance of Hohokam traditions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Archaeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference105 articles.
1. Lekson Stephen H. 2006 Review of Centuries of Decline during the Hohokam Classic Period at Pueblo Grande . American Antiquity 71:783–784.
2. Hoppa Robert D. , and Saunders Shelley R. 1998 The MAD Legacy: How Meaningful is Mean-Age-at-Death in Skeletal Samples. Human Evolution 13:1–14.
3. Lopez Daniel 2007 Huhugam. In The Hohokam Millennium, edited by Suzanne K. Fish and Paul R. Fish, pp. 117–121. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
4. Antonov A. N. 1947 Children Born during the Siege of Leningrad in 1942. Journal of Pediatrics 30:250–259.
5. Bongaarts John , and Cain Mead 1982 Demographic Responses to Famine. In Famine, edited by Kevin M. Cahill, pp. 44–59. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献