Affiliation:
1. a Division of Public Health Services, Department of Surgery & Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
2. b George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Learning Objectives
After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Outline a process that cancer organizations can use to design, implement, prioritize, and evaluate cancer survivor programs.Describe the scientific evidence for benefit from survivorship interventions and the process and strategies for implementation and evaluation to promote sustainable programs.
This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com
Although calls for improvements in cancer survivorship planning and programming exist, implementation has lagged. As with most guidelines, moving from recommendations to implementation requires active planning and systems changes to insure sustained use. Here, we draw on the latest in implementation science to outline a process that cancer organizations can use in designing, implementing, prioritizing, and evaluating cancer survivor programs to improve patient outcomes, using smoking cessation as a primary example. We consider the scientific evidence for benefit from interventions and the strategy for implementation and evaluation to sustain programs.
Funder
American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professorship
NIH
National Center for Research Resources
National Institutes of Health
NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference40 articles.
1. Preparing professional staff to care for cancer survivors;Grant;J Cancer Surviv,2007
2. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006;Horner
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献