Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations

Author:

Miller David W.1,Roseen Eric J.2ORCID,Stone Jennifer A.M.3,Gardiner Paula4,Olson Juli5ORCID,Rosen Shellie6,Wayne Peter7ORCID,Davis Robert8,Coeytaux Remy9ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. University Hospitals, Connor Integrative Health Network, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio

2. Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

5. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia

6. Crane Herbs, Austin, Texas

7. Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

8. Society for Acupuncture Research, Burlington, Vermont

9. Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Abstract

Introduction The field of implementation science is the study of methods that promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions into healthcare policy and practice. While acupuncture has gained significant traction in the American healthcare landscape, its journey has been somewhat haphazard and non-linear. Methods In June 2019, a group of thirty diverse stakeholders was convened by the Society for Acupuncture Research with the support of a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Eugene Washington Engagement Award. This group of stakeholders represented a diverse mix of patients, providers, academicians, researchers, funders, allied health professionals, insurers, association leaders, certification experts, and military program developers. The collective engaged in discussion that explored acupuncture’s status in healthcare, including reflections on its safety, effectiveness, best practices, and the actual implementation of acupuncture as seen from diverse stakeholder viewpoints. Objectives A primary goal was to consider how to utilize knowledge from the field of implementation science more systematically and intentionally to disseminate information about acupuncture and its research base, through application of methods known to implementation science. The group also considered novel challenges that acupuncture may present to known implementation processes. Findings This article summarizes the initial findings of this in-person meeting of stakeholders and the ongoing discussion among the subject matter experts who authored this report. The goal of this report is to catalyze greater conversation about how the field of implementation science might intersect with practice, access, research, and policymaking pertaining to acupuncture. Core concepts of implementation science and its relationship to acupuncture are introduced, and the case for acupuncture as an Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is established. The status of the field and current environment of acupuncture is examined, and the perspectives of four stakeholder groups––patients, two types of professional practitioners, and researchers––are explored in more detail.

Funder

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3