Use of Continuous Glucose Monitor in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Requiring Insulin Infusion: An Observational Study

Author:

Faulds Eileen R1ORCID,Boutsicaris Andrew2,Sumner Lyndsey2,Jones Laureen3,McNett Molly4,Smetana Keaton S3,May Casey C3,Buschur Elizabeth5,Exline Matthew C6,Ringel Matthew D5ORCID,Dungan Kathleen5

Affiliation:

1. The Ohio State University College of Nursing, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

2. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA

3. The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

4. Implementation/Translation Science Core, Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for EBP, Columbus, OH, USA

5. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

6. Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

Abstract

Abstract Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created a need for remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective To evaluate feasibility and patient safety of a hybrid monitoring strategy of point-of-care (POC) BG plus continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in the ICU. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting ICU of an academic medical center. Patients Patients with COVID-19 on IV insulin. Intervention After meeting initial validation criteria, CGM was used for IV insulin titration and POC BG was performed every 6 hours or as needed. Main Outcome Measures Outcomes included frequency of POC BG, workflow, safety, and accuracy measures. Results The study included 19 patients, 18 with CGM data, mean age 58 years, 89% on mechanical ventilation, 37% on vasopressors, and 42% on dialysis. The median time to CGM validation was 137 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 114-206). During IV insulin, the median number of POC values was 7 (IQR 6-16) on day 1, and declined slightly thereafter (71% reduction compared with standard of 24/day). The median number of CGM values used nonadjunctively to titrate IV insulin was 11.5 (IQR 0, 15) on day 1 and increased thereafter. Time in range 70 to 180 mg/dL was 64 ± 23% on day 1 and 72 ± 16% on days 2 through 7, whereas time <70 mg/dL was 1.5 ± 4.1% on day 1 and <1% on days 2 through 7. Conclusions This study provides data to support that CGM using a hybrid protocol is feasible, accurate, safe, and has potential to reduce nursing and staff workload.

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3