Feasibility and Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Guide Computerized Insulin Infusion Therapy in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Ang Lynn1ORCID,Lin Yu Kuei1ORCID,Schroeder Lee F.2,Huang Yiyuan3,DeGeorge Christina A.1,Arnold Patrick4,Akanbi Folake5,Knotts Sharon1,DuBois Elizabeth1,Desbrough Nicole1,Qu Yunyan1,Freeman Regi6,Esfandiari Nazanene H.1,Pop-Busui Rodica1ORCID,Gianchandani Roma17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

4. Department of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

6. Michigan Department of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the feasibility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for titrating continuous intravenous insulin infusion (CII) to manage hyperglycemia in postoperative individuals in the cardiovascular intensive care unit and assessed their accuracy, nursing acceptance, and postoperative individual satisfaction. Methods: Dexcom G6 CGM devices were applied to 59 postsurgical patients with hyperglycemia receiving CII. A hybrid approach combining CGM with periodic point-of-care blood glucose (POC-BG) tests with two phases (initial-ongoing) of validation was used to determine CGM accuracy. Mean and median absolute relative differences and Clarke Error Grid were plotted to evaluate the CGM accuracy. Surveys of nurses and patients on the use of CGMs experience were conducted and results were analyzed. Results: In this cohort (mean age 64, 32% female, 32% with diabetes) with 864 paired POC-BG and CGM values analyzed, mean and median absolute relative difference between POC-BG and CGM values were 13.2% and 9.8%, respectively. 99.7% of paired CGM and POC-BG were in Zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid. Responses from nurses reported CGMs being very or quite convenient (n = 28; 93%) and it was favored over POC-BG testing (n = 28; 93%). Majority of patients (n = 42; 93%) reported their care process using CGM as being good or very good. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility, accuracy, and nursing convenience of adopting CGM via a hybrid approach for insulin titration in postoperative settings. These findings provide robust rationale for larger confirmatory studies to evaluate the benefit of CGM in postoperative care to improve workflow, enhance health outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

Funder

JDRF

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3