Abstract
I present the notion of epistemic injustice coined by Miranda Fricker and apply it to the situation of people with intersex traits, especially intersex children who are the subjects of “normalizing” surgery. Several studies from Polish hospitals show that both early “normalizing” surgery and the decision to postpone such surgery can result in harm to an intersex child. For this reason, I claim that “normalizing” surgery is only an expression of the epistemic hermeneutical injustice existing before the surgery and that its source is the lack of an empirically adequate notion of sex characteristics. The binary notion is too simple to grasp intersex traits, and this epistemic dysfunction turns into practical harm. In contrast to Morgan Carpenter, I defend the nonbinary gender category as being important to limiting “normalizing” surgery.
Reference42 articles.
1. Bajszczak K., Szarras-Czapnik M., Oszukowska E. et al. (2013), "Kliniczne i psychologiczne konsekwencje odroczenia gonadektomii oraz chirurgicznej korekcji obojnaczych zewnętrznych narządów płciowych do okresu dojrzałości u pacjentki z częściową niewrażliwością na androgeny,” Endokrynologia Pediatryczna/Pediatric Endocrinology 2 (43): 69–80.
2. Boczkowski K. (1966), “Franciszek Neugebauer (1856–1914): Pioneer in the Study of Hermaphroditism,” Polish Medical Science and History 9 (4): 155–157.
3. Brussels Collaboration (2019), “The Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity. Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting and the Rights of the Child: Moving Toward Consensus,” The American Journal of Bioethics 19 (10): 17–28.
4. Butler J. (2004), Undoing Gender, Routledge, New York and London.
5. Carmack A., Notini L., Earp B.D. (2016), “Should Surgery for Hypospadias be Performed Before an Age of Consent?,” Journal of Sex Research 53 (8): 1047–1058.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献