Affiliation:
1. Morishita Orthopedics Clinic
2. Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University
3. Kanazawa College of Art
Abstract
The dominant hand can be defined in such a way that Oldfield's Handedness Inventory may not identify the superior hand, i.e., the hand with more strength and/or more force control. The dominant and nondominant hands were compared for two different grip force-exertion tests. 50 healthy young men ( M age = 21.1 yr.) performed two tests with each hand: a maximal grip strength test and a controlled force-exertion test with dynamic demand. In the latter test, the participants matched their submaximal grip force to the changing demand values with real-time feedback. The total sum of the differences between the demand value and grip force value for 25 sec. was used as an evaluation parameter for the test (unit: %). Mean maximal grip force values in the right and left hands were 439.9 N ( SD = 59.1) and 405.6 N ( SD = 59.3), respectively. Mean controlled force-exertion test values in the right and left hands were 610.3% ( SD = 150.2) and 722.6% ( SD = 147.8), respectively. In both tests, the dominant hand was significantly stronger and controlled dynamic force better. The relationship between the two hands was very high. Based on this study's criteria, the dominant hand was stronger in 34% ( n = 17) of participants during the maximal grip strength test and more controlled in 54% ( n = 27) of participants during the controlled force-exertion test. Thus, the dynamic force control test showed that for significantly more people the dominant hand is stronger and controls force better. Controlled force exertion may be a better test for identifying the superior hand.
Subject
Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献