Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer

Author:

Thrumurthy S G12,Morris J J A3,Mughal M M12,Ward J B1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

3. Department of Medical Statistics, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Establishing preferences for surgery is paramount to preoperative patient counselling. This study aimed to prioritize and compare preferences of patients and doctors towards surgery for oesophagogastric cancer, to aid the counselling process. Methods A discrete-choice questionnaire containing hypothetical scenarios was designed to test patient preferences for six treatment attributes: mortality, morbidity, quality of life (QoL), cure rate, hospital type and surgeon's reputation. The survey was mailed to all patients who underwent oesophagogastric cancer resection from 2008 to 2009 at two teaching hospital sites. All doctors at these sites with previous experience in counselling patients for cancer surgery were also identified and presented with the survey. Results were analysed using a random-effects probit regression model. Spearman correlation was used to compare participants' implicit choices from the discrete-choice scenarios (their true preferences) with their explicit choices from the direct ranking of preferences (their perceived preferences). Results Eighty-one patients and 90 doctors completed the survey. Some 15 per cent of patients and 31 per cent of doctors based their choices solely on QoL. In order of importance, patients based their implicit responses on QoL (β = 1·19), cure rate (β = 0·82), morbidity (β = − 0·70), surgeon's reputation (β = 0·60), mortality (β = − 0·57) and hospital type (β = 0·26). Doctors similarly indicated QoL (β = 1·14) and hospital type (β = 0·31) as highest and lowest preferences respectively, but placed far greater emphasis on mortality (β = − 0·80) than morbidity (β = − 0·35). Implicit and explicit preferences correlated only for morbidity and surgeon's reputation in the patient cohort. Conclusion Clinicians may better meet patients' expectations and facilitate informed decision-making if QoL, cure rate and morbidity are emphasized foremost. A similar study employing preoperative patients is warranted for further clarification of preferences.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3