Comparison of two 3D reconstruction models for understanding of complicated female pelvic tumors

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThree‐dimensional (3D) reconstructed models have been shown to improve visualization in complex female pelvic tumors. Cinematic rendering (CR) is a 3D imaging technique for computed tomography (CT) images, which creates more realistic images with the ability to enhance imaging of anatomical features for diagnosis.This study was set up to compare two types of 3D models and to validate the use of 3D anatomical techniques for the diagnosis of complex female pelvic tumors.MethodsThe preclinical, randomized, two‐sequence crossover investigation was performed from December 2022 to January 2023 at First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Sixteen residents and 10 attending surgeons assessed the cases of 23 patients with two types of 3D model images. The surgeons were randomly assigned to two assessment sequences (CR‐3D model group and CT‐3D model group). For each case, participants selected one question that probed fundamental questions about the tumor's genesis throughout each assessment period. Following a 4‐week washout period, case assessments were transferred to the other image modality.ResultsThe main result assessment was the accuracy of the answers. The time to answer the questions and the case assessment questionnaire was added as a secondary outcome.The mean scores in the CR‐3D models (19.35 ± 1.87) varied significantly from those in the CT‐CR group (16.77 ± 1.8) (P < 0.001), and solving the questions in the CT‐3D model sequence (41.96 ± 6.31 s) varied significantly from that in the CR‐3D model sequence (52.88 ± 5.95 s) (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that there were statistically significant variations in the scores of female reproductive tumors, pelvic tumors other than the reproductive system, and retroperitoneal tumors (P = 0.005). Analysis of the assessment questionnaire showed that more surgeons choose CR 3D reconstruction (8.31 ± 0.76 vs 7.15 ± 1.19, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe results suggest that each 3D reconstruction method has its own advantages. Surgeons feel that CR reconstruction models are a useful technique that can improve their comprehension of complex pelvic tumors, while traditional 3D models have an advantage in terms of speed to diagnosis.