Psychometrics of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia present and lifetime version for DSM‐5 in Japanese outpatients

Author:

Makino Takuya1234,Suzuki Futoshi12,Nishiyama Takeshi5ORCID,Ishibashi Saeko67,Nakamichi Hidetaka1,Iida Tomoko12,Shimada Shoko124,Tomari Shinji23,Imanari Eiji23,Higashi Takuma23,Fukumoto Shintaro23,Kurata Sawa124,Mizuno Yoshifumi124,Kimura Takuma8,Kuru Yukiko9,Morimoto Takeshi12,Kosaka Hirotaka1234

Affiliation:

1. Research Center for Child Mental Development University of Fukui Eiheiji Japan

2. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychological Medicine University of Fukui Hospital Eiheiji Japan

3. Department of Neuropsychiatry Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Fukui Eiheiji Japan

4. Division of Developmental Higher Brain Functions United Graduate School of Child Development University of Fukui Eiheiji Japan

5. Department of Public Health Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya Japan

6. Faculty of Nursing Science Tsuruga Nursing University Tsuruga Japan

7. Integrated and Advanced Medical Course Graduate School of Medical Sciences University of Fukui Eiheiji Japan

8. Department of Child Studies Nagoya Management Junior College Owariasahi Japan

9. Medical Education Center Aichi Medical University School of Medicine Nagakute Japan

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School‐Age Children‐Present and Lifetime version (K‐SADS‐PL) is a widely used semi‐structured diagnostic interview in child and adolescent psychiatry. However, the psychometric properties of its updated version, the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5, have scarcely been examined, especially for criterion validity. This study was designed to examine the inter‐rater reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5 in 137 Japanese outpatients.MethodsTwo of 12 experienced clinicians independently performed the K‐SADS interview for each patient in a conjoint session, and the resulting consensus diagnosis was compared with a “best‐estimate” diagnosis made by two of eight experienced clinicians using all available information for the patient.ResultsThe inter‐rater reliability was excellent, as shown by κ > 0.75 for all disorders, with the exception of current separation anxiety disorder. The criterion validity was fair to good, as shown by κ > 0.40 for all disorders, with the exception of current and lifetime agoraphobia. The construct validity was also good, as shown by theoretically expected associations between the K‐SADS‐PL diagnoses and subscales of the child behavior checklist.ConclusionThe K‐SADS‐PL for DSM‐5, now available in Japanese, generates valid diagnoses in child and adolescent psychiatry.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3