Domain‐specific cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Lugosi Katalin12,Engh Marie A1,Huszár Zsolt13,Hegyi Péter14,Mátrai Péter5,Csukly Gábor13,Molnár Zsolt167,Horváth Klaudia2,Mátis Dóra1,Mezei Zsolt8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Translational Medicine Semmelweis University Üllői út 26 1085 Budapest Hungary

2. Multiple Sclerosis Centre Bajcsy‐Zsilinszky Hospital Maglódi út 89‐91 Budapest 1106 Hungary

3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Balassa utca 6 Budapest 1083 Hungary

4. Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

5. Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School University of Pécs Pécs Hungary

6. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Semmelweis University Üllői út 78 1083 Budapest Hungary

7. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Poznan University of Medical Sciences ul. Przybyszewskiego 49 60‐355 Poznan Poland

8. Department of Neurology Semmelweis University Balassa utca 6 1083 Budapest Hungary

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveMethods of cognitive measurements in multiple sclerosis (MS) are not standardized. We aimed to identify the prevalence of cognitive domain‐specific impairment (DSI) in MS by using subtests of the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB‐N) with analyzing different cutoff values.MethodsThe systematic review and meta‐analysis were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021287004). The systematic literature search was performed via PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL on 24 October 2021. Inclusion criteria were adults of different MS subtypes (CIS, RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS) with the condition of distinct DSI measured by BRB‐N. Pediatric MS, computerized versions of BRB‐N, and patients receiving steroids were excluded. Primary outcome was pooled prevalence rates of impaired patients within each cutoff and MS subtype, with 95% confidence interval, I‐squared statistics for heterogeneity, and chi‐squared test for subgroup differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the “JBI Quality Assessment Tool for Prevalence Studies.”ResultsIn 48 eligible observational studies (n = 3431 patients), the three most prevalent thresholds were the 2.0 SD and 1.5 SD below the mean of normative values, and the score below the fifth percentile of the normative values. A progressively increasing worsening of the overall DSI was observed from CIS, moving toward RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS.InterpretationCognitive impairment is observed in all MS phenotypes, with varying degrees. Due to several potential influencing factors, our comprehensive literature review has not revealed consistent findings, and we, therefore, recommend considering a more sophisticated, “individual referencing” approach, acknowledging the diverse clinical and sociodemographic characteristics among populations and disparities in cognitive testing.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3