Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry University College London 20, Gordon Street London WC1H 0AJ UK
2. Department of Chemistry-BMC Uppsala University SE-751 23 Uppsala Sweden
3. Biosynth Laboratories Ltd (formerly Cambridge Research Biochemicals Ltd) 17-18 Belasis Court, Belasis Hall Technology Park Billingham TS23 4AZ UK
4. Department of Structural and Molecular Biology Division of Biosciences University College London, UCL Darwin Building, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
Abstract
AbstractCyclisation of peptides by forming thioether (lanthionine), disulfide (cystine) or methylene thioacetal bridges between side chains is established as an important tool to stabilise a given structure, enhance metabolic stability and optimise both potency and selectivity. However, a systematic comparative study of the effects of differing bridging modalities on peptide conformation has not previously been carried out. In this paper, we have used the NMR deconvolution algorithm, NAMFIS, to determine the conformational ensembles, in aqueous solution, of three cyclic analogues of angiotensin(1–7), incorporating either disulfide, or non‐reducible thioether or methylene thioacetal bridges. We demonstrate that the major solution conformations are conserved between the different bridged peptides, but the distribution of conformations differs appreciably. This suggests that subtle differences in ring size and bridging structure can be exploited to fine‐tune the conformational properties of cyclic peptides, which may modulate their bioactivities.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Vetenskapsrådet
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna
Wellcome Trust