Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher Ikenobe 3011‐2, Kagawa‐ken 761‐0799 Miki‐cho Japan
2. Department of Economics Thompson Rivers University Kamloops British Columbia V2C 0C8 Canada
Abstract
Key points
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for authorship are the dominant guidelines that guide who, and under what circumstances, an individual can be an author of an academic paper.
Large language models (LLMs) and AI, like ChatGPT, given their ability and versatility, pose a challenge to the human‐based authorship model.
Several journals and publishers have already prohibited the assignment of authorship to AI, LLMs, and even ChatGPT, not recognizing them as valid authors.
We debate this premise, and asked ChatGPT to opine on this issue. ChatGPT considers itself as an invalid author.
We applied the CRediT criteria to AI, finding that it was definitively able to satisfy three out of the 14 criteria, but only in terms of assistance. This was validated by ChatGPT itself.
Subject
Communication,Library and Information Sciences
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献