Author:
Kaebnick Gregory E.,Magnus David Christopher,Kao Audiey,Hosseini Mohammad,Resnik David,Dubljević Veljko,Rentmeester Christy,Gordijn Bert,Cherry Mark J.
Abstract
AbstractGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also be valuable for achieving those goals. In the interests of fostering a wider conversation about how generative AI may be used, we have developed a preliminary set of recommendations for its use in scholarly publishing. We hope that the recommendations and rationales set out here will help the scholarly community navigate toward a deeper understanding of the strengths, limits, and challenges of AI for responsible scholarly work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Education,Health (social science),Philosophy
Reference10 articles.
1. Gordijn, B., and H. Ten Have. 2023. ChatGPT: Evolution or revolution? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 26 (1): 1–2.
2. Hosseini, M., L.M. Rasmussen, and D.B. Resnik. 2023a. Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.
3. Hosseini, M., D.B. Resnik, and K. Holmes. 2023b. The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449.
4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals,” updated May 2023, at https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.
5. Liebrenz, M., R. Schleifer, A. Buadze, et al. 2023. Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing. Lancet Digital Health 5 (3): E105–E106.