Comparison of skin prick test and prick‐to‐prick test with fruits and vegetables in the diagnosis of food allergy

Author:

Terlouw Severina12,van Boven Frank E.2ORCID,Borsboom‐van Zonneveld Monika1,de Graaf‐in ’t Veld Tineke1,Gerth van Wijk Roy2,van Daele Paul L. A.2,van Maaren Maurits S.2ORCID,Kuijpers Jac H. S. A. M.3,Veenbergen Sharon3,de Jong Nicolette W.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Allergology Albert Schweitzer Hospital Zwijndrecht The Netherlands

2. Internal Medicine Allergology & Clinical Immunology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

3. Department of Immunology Laboratory Medical Immunology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPrick‐to‐prick (PTP) test with fresh food is accepted as a reliable tool for measuring sensitization to fruits and vegetables. Not all fruits and vegetables are available throughout the year. The objective of this study was to investigate whether skin prick test (SPT) performed with frozen juice of fruits and vegetables (FJFV) is a good alternative to PTP tests performed with fresh fruits and vegetables (FFV).MethodsAdult patients suspected of having a food allergy to fruits and/or vegetables were included. A questionnaire was used to score symptoms after consumption of apple, kiwi, peach, tomato, and carrot. SPTs with FJFV, and PTP tests with FFV were performed. Intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICC) between the SPT and PTP test results were calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of both diagnostic tests towards food allergen specific symptoms (FASS) were calculated.ResultsThirty‐six patients were included. FASS was positive in 75% for apple, 53% for kiwi, 44% for peach, 25% for tomato, and 22% for carrot. ICC between SPT and PTP test results were moderate for apple (0.72) and kiwi (0.71), strong for peach (0.75) and tomato (0.89), and very strong for carrot (0.94). Sensitivity was equal for the SPT and PTP tests for apple (0.93), peach (0.81), and carrot (1.00), and comparable for kiwi (0.50 resp. 0.70), and tomato (0.44 resp. 0.56). Specificity was equal for apple (0.33), peach (0.15), and carrot (0.41), and comparable for kiwi (0.29 resp. 0.21) and tomato (0.80 resp. 0.72).ConclusionsResults of SPT with FJFV and PTP test with FFV are comparable. SPT with FJFV is a good alternative in the daily practice of the allergists.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference20 articles.

1. Frozen fruit skin prick test for the diagnosis of fruit allergy;Garriga T;Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol,2010

2. IgE-Mediated food allergy diagnosis: Current status and new perspectives

3. An overview of fruit allergy and the causative allergens;Hassan AK;Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol,2015

4. Measurement of health-related quality of life in adult patients with birch pollen-associated food allergy

5. Advances in Food Allergy Diagnosis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3