Experimental and numerical investigation on low‐velocity impact response of sandwich structure with functionally graded core

Abstract

AbstractThe present research investigates optimizing the impact resistance of functionally graded sandwich structures using experimental and numerical approaches. The low‐velocity impact (LVI) responses of functionally graded sandwich composite (FGSC) with different configurations with skin material jute/rubber/jute (JRJ) and core material having epoxy and sea sand by volume fraction of sea sand at 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%. Sandwich structures were impacted with LVI (5.89, 10.92, and 15.18 m/s), with the impactor dropped from heights of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 m with precompressed spring loads. FGSC samples are considered a deformable body, and the impactor is modeled as a rigid body using commercially accessible dynamic explicit software. The burn‐out test and weight method were used to test the core's gradience; both methods' results substantially matched, and the variance in gradation could be observed. The proposed sandwich structure characteristics are examined by energy absorption, peak force, energy loss percentage, and coefficient of restitution. Results showed that SC30S provides greater energy absorption and superior damage resistance when tested on LVI. To evaluate the accuracy of experimental findings in predicting the indentation behavior of the sandwich structure, the finite element analysis was used to compare with the experimental results. According to the examination of these proposed FGSC overall performance, they could potentially be employed as sacrificial materials for LVI applications like claddings to shield major structural components. The systematic approach used in this work serves as a standard for choosing and using FGSC effectively for LVI applications.Highlights Low‐velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures was investigated. Combining flexible skin and epoxy core enhances energy absorption. Based on impact energy levels, impact damage areas were determined. Examined sandwich structure advantages in structural and aerospace uses. In terms of time and cost, the numerical analysis method would be useful.