Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009

Published:2013-07-26 Issue:3 Volume:4 Page:242-255
ISSN:1759-2879
Container-title:Research Synthesis Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Res. Syn. Meth.

Author:

Dahabreh Issa J.¹,Chung Mei²,Kitsios Georgios D.²³,Terasawa Teruhiko⁴⁵,Raman Gowri²,Tatsioni Athina²⁶,Tobar Annette⁷,Lau Joseph¹,Trikalinos Thomas A.¹,Schmid Christopher H.¹⁸

Affiliation:

1. Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Program in Public Health; Brown University; Providence RI USA

2. Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies; Tufts Medical Center; Boston MA USA

3. Department of General Internal Medicine; Lahey Clinic Medical Center; Burlington MA USA

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Fujita Health University Nanakuri Sanatorium; Fujita Health University School of Medicine; Tsu Mie Japan

5. Clinical Research Center; National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center; Nagoya Japan

6. Department of Internal Medicine; University of Ioannina School of Medicine; Ioannina Greece

7. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine; University of Colorado; Aurora CO USA

8. Department of Biostatistics, Program in Public Health; Brown University; Providence RI USA

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1083/fullpdf

Reference50 articles.

1. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration;Altman;Annals of Internal Medicine,2001

2. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves;Arends;Medical Decision Making,2008

3. Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head;Berlin;Statistics in Medicine,2002

4. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative;Bossuyt;Annals of Internal Medicine,2003a

5. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration;Bossuyt;Annals of Internal Medicine,2003b

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A systematic review of meta-analyses in second language research: current practices, issues, and recommendations;Applied Linguistics Review;2023-01-10

2. Different evidence summaries have implications for contextualizing findings of meta-analysis of diagnostic tests;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2019-05

3. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2017-03

4. Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy;Radiology;2016-10

5. Systematic Reviews: A Social Work Perspective;Australian Social Work;2015-04-21