Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering Toronto Metropolitan University Toronto Ontario Canada
3. Orthopaedic Biomechanics Lab Victoria Hospital London Ontario Canada
4. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery Western University London Ontario Canada
5. Kite Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
Abstract
AbstractComminuted proximal humerus fractures are often repaired by metal plates, but potentially still experience bone refracture, bone “stress shielding,” screw perforation, delayed healing, and so forth. This “proof of principle” investigation is the initial step towards the design of a new plate using alternative materials to address some of these problems. Finite element modeling was used to create design graphs for bone stress, plate stress, screw stress, and interfragmentary motion via three different fixations (no, 1, or 2 “kickstand” [KS] screws across the fracture) using a wide range of plate elastic moduli (EP = 5–200 GPa). Well‐known design optimization criteria were used that could minimize bone, plate, and screw failure (i.e., peak stress < ultimate tensile strength), reduce bone “stress shielding” (i.e., bone stress under the new plate ≥ bone stress for an intact humerus, titanium plate, and/or steel plate “control”), and encourage callus growth leading to early healing (i.e., 0.2 mm ≤ axial interfragmentary motion ≤ 1 mm; shear/axial interfragmentary motion ratio <1.6). The findings suggest that a potentially optimal configuration involves the new plate being manufactured from a material with an EP of 5–41.5 GPa with 1 KS screw; but, using no KS screws would cause immediate bone fracture and 2 KS screws would almost certainly lead to delayed healing. A prototype plate might be fabricated using alternative materials suggested for orthopedics and other industries, like fiber‐metal laminates, fiber‐reinforced polymers, metal foams, pure polymers, shape memory alloys, or 3D‐printed porous metals.
Reference78 articles.
1. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture;Lau TW;Int Orthop,2007
2. Percutaneous insertion of a proximal humeral locking plate: an anatomic study;Smith J;Injury,2007
3. Biomechanical effect of medial cortical support and medial screw support on locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures with a medial gap: a finite element analysis;Yang P;Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2015
4. Finite element‐predicted effects of screw configuration in proximal humerus fracture fixation;Tilton M;J Biomech Eng,2020