Evaluation of Bioequivalence for Avapritinib Tablets in Chinese Participants Under Fasting Conditions Using a Reference‐Scaled Average Bioequivalence Method

Abstract

AbstractThis study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of 2 avapritinib tablets formulations. A randomized, open‐label, single‐center trial was conducted on fasting, healthy Chinese participants. The study utilized a partial replicated design with 3 sequences and 3 periods. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 sequences, with each sequence receiving the reference formulation twice and the test formulation once. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The bioequivalence of the 2 avapritinib formulations was assessed using reference‐scaled average bioequivalence for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the average bioequivalence analysis for the area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC). Out of 39 participants, 38 completed the study. For Cmax, the 1‐sided 95% upper confidence interval (CI) bound from the scaled approach was −0.035 (<0) and the point estimate value was 0.958, falling inside the acceptance range of 0.8‐1.25. For both the AUC over all concentrations measured (AUC0‐t) and the AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0‐inf), the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios (0.87‐1.01) also met the bioequivalence criteria of 0.8‐1.25. Consequently, the study demonstrated that the 2 avapritinib formulations were bioequivalent under fasting conditions.