Preliminary development and validation of the Indonesian Pediatric Epilepsy Questionnaire (INA‐PEPSI) to determine epilepsy and distinguish focal and generalized epilepsy in infants and children with unprovoked seizure in low‐resource settings

Author:

Handryastuti Setyo1,Tiansyah Rizal Agus1,Mangunatmadja Irawan1,Saputra Deddy R.2,Octaviana Fitri3,Budikayanti Astri3,Alatas Fatima Safira1,Pusponegoro Hardiono D.1,Tridjaja Bambang1,Soebandi Amanda1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Child Health Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital‐Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia

2. Department of Child Health Fatmawati General Hospital Jakarta Indonesia

3. Department of Neurology Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital‐Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo outline the preliminary development and validation of a questionnaire for diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy among infants and children in Indonesia, where electroencephalography and pediatric neurologists are generally not available.MethodsA 10‐question questionnaire comprising of 43 items was developed through literature review and expert panel discussions. Then, the questionnaire was administered by pediatricians to 75 children aged 1 month to 18 years old presenting with >1 episode of unprovoked seizures at an interval of >24 h. Subsequently, the questionnaire was assessed for content validity with item‐level and scale‐level content validity indices and ratio, construct validity with item‐total correlation tests, criterion validity with diagnostic parameter assessments, and inter‐rater reliability using Cohen's kappa (κ) and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient.ResultsThe questionnaire exhibited favorable internal validity and reliability in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy, with excellent content (both indices and ratio at 1) and construct validity (rcount > rtable at p < 0.001), inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.86 and κ = 0.84), and internal consistency (α = 0.634 and α = 0.806). The questionnaire had a sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95%CI 89.1–99.5%) and 95.0% (79.5–99.6%) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.946 [0.900–0.992, p < 0.001]) in diagnosing epilepsy and 80.0% (57.4–95.7%) and 97.4% (89.7–99.2%) (AUC 0.889 [0.783–0.995, p < 0.001]) in distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy, with a misdiagnosis rate of 4.0%.SignificanceThe questionnaire shows promising potential in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy. Further external validation studies in larger and more diverse populations are required to confirm our findings.Plain Language SummaryThe diagnosis of epilepsy in children is challenging, particularly in resource‐limited settings such as Indonesia, where advanced diagnostic tests and pediatric neurologists are scarce. The Indonesian Pediatric Epilepsy Questionnaire (INA‐PEPSI) is designed to address these limitations by enabling healthcare professionals in Indonesia to diagnose epilepsy and classify its types without relying on advanced diagnostic tools. Although the questionnaire is still in the early stages of development and validation, this study demonstrates that the questionnaire exhibits good overall diagnostic performance in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing epilepsy types among Indonesian children.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3