Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, Research School of Medicine and Psychology Australian National University Canberra Australia
2. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences Melbourne University Kew Victoria Australia
3. School of Regulation and Global Governance Australian National University Canberra Australia
Abstract
AbstractEveryone must consume, but the wealthy consume more than most. Half of global household emissions come from the world's top 10% of income earners. In this review, we investigate the minimalist lifestyle to find out if minimalism could deliver the dual benefit of reduced carbon emissions and increased wellbeing. Minimalists have voluntarily chosen to have few possessions, despite economic and social structures that encourage consumption. Having fewer possessions suggests they might have a lower carbon emissions. A review of three other low‐consumption lifestyles: frugalism, tightwadism and voluntary simplicity, offers some support for this hypothesis, but the empirical evidence regarding minimalism is scant. We also review minimalist motivations, finding some support for a positive association between wellbeing and minimalism. We conclude that while minimalism might offer wellbeing benefits, research on carbon emissions is inconclusive. Furthermore, even if minimalism did result in reduced emissions, the minimalist lifestyle maybe too individualistic to create social change.This article is categorized under:
Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses
The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior
Climate and Development > Sustainability and Human Well‐Being
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Polarization in Consumer Behavior;Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services;2024-02-07