AI‐based motion artifact severity estimation in undersampled MRI allowing for selection of appropriate reconstruction models

Author:

Beljaards Laurens1,Pezzotti Nicola23,Rao Chinmay1,Doneva Mariya4,van Osch Matthias J. P.1,Staring Marius1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

2. Cardiologs Philips Paris France

3. Faculty of Computer Science Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven The Netherlands

4. Philips Research Hamburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMagnetic Resonance acquisition is a time consuming process, making it susceptible to patient motion during scanning. Even motion in the order of a millimeter can introduce severe blurring and ghosting artifacts, potentially necessitating re‐acquisition. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be accelerated by acquiring only a fraction of k‐space, combined with advanced reconstruction techniques leveraging coil sensitivity profiles and prior knowledge. Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based reconstruction techniques have recently been popularized, but generally assume an ideal setting without intra‐scan motion.PurposeTo retrospectively detect and quantify the severity of motion artifacts in undersampled MRI data. This may prove valuable as a safety mechanism for AI‐based approaches, provide useful information to the reconstruction method, or prompt for re‐acquisition while the patient is still in the scanner.MethodsWe developed a deep learning approach that detects and quantifies motion artifacts in undersampled brain MRI. We demonstrate that synthetically motion‐corrupted data can be leveraged to train the convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based motion artifact estimator, generalizing well to real‐world data. Additionally, we leverage the motion artifact estimator by using it as a selector for a motion‐robust reconstruction model in case a considerable amount of motion was detected, and a high data consistency model otherwise.ResultsTraining and validation were performed on 4387 and 1304 synthetically motion‐corrupted images and their uncorrupted counterparts, respectively. Testing was performed on undersampled in vivo motion‐corrupted data from 28 volunteers, where our model distinguished head motion from motion‐free scans with 91% and 96% accuracy when trained on synthetic and on real data, respectively. It predicted a manually defined quality label (‘Good’, ‘Medium’ or ‘Bad’ quality) correctly in 76% and 85% of the time when trained on synthetic and real data, respectively. When used as a selector it selected the appropriate reconstruction network 93% of the time, achieving near optimal SSIM values.ConclusionsThe proposed method quantified motion artifact severity in undersampled MRI data with high accuracy, enabling real‐time motion artifact detection that can help improve the safety and quality of AI‐based reconstructions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3