Using a participatory approach to identify priorities to advance LHS implementation at an academic medical center

Author:

Eagleson Reid M.1,Gibson Madeline1,Dobbins Carletta2,Van Pelt Frederick2,Hall Allyson3,Hearld Larry3,Cherrington Andrea L.4,McMahon Jacob5,Jones Keith Tony6,Mugavero Michael J.1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

2. Department of Clinical Practice Transformation University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

3. Department of Health Services Administration University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

4. Department of Preventive Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

5. College of Science and Mathematics University of Auburn Auburn Alabama USA

6. University of Alabama Health Services Foundation, UAB Medicine, and Clinical Affairs, University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionLike many other academic medical centers, the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) aspires to adopt learning health system (LHS) principles and practices more fully. Applying LHS principles establishes a culture where clinical and operational practices constantly generate questions and leverage information technology (IT) and methodological expertise to facilitate systematic evaluation of care delivery, health outcomes, and the effects of improvement initiatives. Despite the potential benefits, differences in priorities, timelines, and expectations spanning an academic medical center's clinical care, administrative operations, and research arms create barriers to adopting and implementing an LHS.MethodsUAB's Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, in partnership with UAB Medicine's Department of Clinical Practice Transformation, applied part of the Precision Problem Solving methodology to advance the implementation of LHS principles at UAB.ResultsSixty‐two stakeholders across the UAB health system and academic schools noted 131 concerns regarding the development of an LHS at UAB. From the 131 items, eight major themes were identified, named, and prioritized through a series of focus groups. Of the eight major themes, “Creating a Structure for Aligned and Informed Prioritization” and “Right Data, Right Time, Improved Performance” ranked in the top three most important themes across all focus groups and became the critical priorities as UAB enhances its LHS. A task force comprised of diverse constituents from across UAB's academic medical center is taking first steps toward addressing these priority areas. Initial funding supports a prototype for enhanced health system data access and pilot projects conducted by researchers embedded in health system teams.ConclusionWe suggest that our experience conducting a deliberate process with broad engagement across both the health system and academic arms of the university may be informative to others seeking to advance LHS principles at academic health centers across a myriad of settings.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3