A quality‐checked and physics‐constrained deep learning method to estimate material basis images from single‐kV contrast‐enhanced chest CT scans

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSingle‐kV CT imaging is one of the primary imaging methods in radiology practices. However, it does not provide material basis images for some subtle lesion characterization tasks in clinical diagnosis.PurposeTo develop a quality‐checked and physics‐constrained deep learning (DL) method to estimate material basis images from single‐kV CT data without resorting to dual‐energy CT acquisition schemes.MethodsSingle‐kV CT images are decomposed into two material basis images using a deep neural network. The role of this network is to generate a feature space with 64 template features with the same matrix dimensions of the input single‐kV CT image. These 64 template image features are then combined to generate the desired material basis images with different sets of combination coefficients, one for each material basis image. Dual‐energy CT image acquisitions with two separate kVs were curated to generate paired training data between a single‐kV CT image and the corresponding two material basis images. To ensure the obtained two material basis images are consistent with the encoded spectral information in the actual projection data, two physics constraints, that is, (1) effective energy of each measured projection datum that characterizes the beam hardening in data acquisitions and (2) physical factors of scanners such as detector and tube characteristics, are incorporated into the end‐to‐end training. The entire architecture is referred to as Deep‐En‐Chroma in this paper. In the application stage, the generated material basis images are sent to a deep quality check (Deep‐QC) network to assess the quality of estimated images and to report the pixel‐wise estimation errors for users. The models were developed using 5592 training and validation pairs generated from 48 clinical cases. Additional 1526 CT images from another 13 patients were used to evaluate the quantitative accuracy of water and iodine basis images estimated by Deep‐En‐Chroma.ResultsFor the iodine basis images estimated by Deep‐En‐Chroma, the mean difference with respect to dual‐energy CT is −0.25 mg/mL, and the agreement limits are [−0.75 mg/mL, +0.24 mg/mL]. For the water basis images estimated by Deep‐En‐Chroma, the mean difference with respect to dual‐energy CT is 0.0 g/mL, and the agreement limits are [−0.01 g/mL, 0.01 g/mL]. Across the test cohort, the median [25th, 75th percentiles] root mean square errors between the Deep‐En‐Chroma and dual‐energy material images are 14 [12, 16] mg/mL for the water images and 0.73 [0.64, 0.80] mg/mL for the iodine images. When significant errors are present in the estimated material basis images, Deep‐QC can capture these errors and provide pixel‐wise error maps to inform users whether the DL results are trustworthy.ConclusionsThe Deep‐En‐Chroma network provides a new pathway to estimating the clinically relevant material basis images from single‐kV CT data and the Deep‐QC module to inform end‐users of the accuracy of the DL material basis images in practice.