Targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for pain prophylaxis and treatment: A systematic review

Author:

Mauch Jaclyn T.1,Kao Dennis S.2,Friedly Janna L.3ORCID,Liu Yusha4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Department of Plastic Surgery Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA

4. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Washington Seattle WA USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveNerve pain frequently develops following amputations and peripheral nerve injuries. Two innovative surgical techniques, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI), are rapidly gaining popularity as alternatives to traditional nerve management, but their effectiveness is unclear.Literature SurveyA review of literature pertaining to TMR and RPNI pain results was conducted. PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases were queried.MethodologyStudies were included if pain outcomes were assessed after TMR or RPNI in the upper or lower extremity, both for prophylaxis performed at the time of amputation and for treatment of postamputation pain. Data were extracted for evaluation.SynthesisSeventeen studies were included, with 14 evaluating TMR (366 patients) and three evaluating RPNI (75 patients). Of these, one study was a randomized controlled trial. Nine studies had a mean follow‐up time of at least 1 year (range 4–27.6 months). For pain treatment, TMR and RPNI improved neuroma pain in 75%–100% of patients and phantom limb pain in 45%–80% of patients, averaging a 2.4–6.2‐point reduction in pain scores on the numeric rating scale postoperatively. When TMR or RPNI was performed prophylactically, many patients reported no neuroma pain (48%–100%) or phantom limb pain (45%–87%) at time of follow‐up. Six TMR studies reported Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores assessing pain intensity, behavior, and interference, which consistently showed a benefit for all measures. Complication rates ranged from 13% to 31%, most frequently delayed wound healing.ConclusionsBoth TMR and RPNI may be beneficial for preventing and treating pain originating from peripheral nerve dysfunction compared to traditional techniques. Randomized trials with longer term follow‐up are needed to directly compare the effectiveness of TMR and RPNI with traditional nerve management techniques.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3