Outcome measures used in peripheral nerve surgery for symptomatic neuroma in upper extremity amputations: A scoping review

Author:

Yang Borum1ORCID,Suresh Rachana2ORCID,Nam Jon1,Mayo Amanda L.34ORCID,Hitzig Sander L.35ORCID,Wong Alison16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

3. St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Division of Plastic Surgery Saint John Regional Hospital Saint John New Brunswick Canada

Abstract

AbstractNovel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult‐acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi‐center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3