Social media and deep learning reveal specific cultural preferences for biodiversity

Author:

Havinga Ilan1ORCID,Marcos Diego2ORCID,Bogaart Patrick3ORCID,Massimino Dario4ORCID,Hein Lars1ORCID,Tuia Devis5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Environmental Systems Analysis Group Wageningen University Wageningen 6708 PB The Netherlands

2. Inria, University of Montpellier Montpellier 34090 France

3. National Accounts Department Statistics Netherlands Henri Faasdreef 312 The Hague 2492 JP The Netherlands

4. British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery Thetford Norfolk IP24 2PU UK

5. Environmental Computational Science and Earth Observation Laboratory Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Industrie 17 Sion Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Social media has created new opportunities to map cultural ecosystem services (CES) related to biodiversity at large scales. However, using these novel data to understand people's preferences in relation to these CES remains a challenge. To address this, we trained a deep learning model to capture people's interactions with selected flora and fauna on Flickr as a cultural service related to biodiversity and compared this with citizen science data on iNaturalist, with photos of individual species considered as human–species interactions. After mapping the distribution of people's interactions in Great Britain on Flickr and iNaturalist, we find significant spatial differences in people's preferences on the two platforms. Using a second, pretrained deep learning model, we were also able to identify different preferences for species groups such as birds on social media versus citizen science. To better understand people's preferences, we also compared people's interactions with species richness and abundance for a group of 36 bird species, sometimes finding large differences between people's interactions and these ecological measures. Our findings demonstrate that social media can be used to include a wider range of preferences in CES assessments along‐side citizen science data. However, these preferences reflect only a limited first‐hand experience of biodiversity. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3