Abstract
Online citizen science projects have broadened options for accessing science and enabled different forms of participation in scientific research for adult and young volunteers. Yet, little is known regarding participation patterns among youth participants. Quantitative approaches were used to investigate the contribution of 183 young volunteers to citizen science on the iNaturalist platform and the participation behaviour that relates to their contribution. The participants accessed and used iNaturalist as part of one-day field-based events (bioblitzes) facilitated by museums. Compared to the observation behaviour of all iNaturalist users, as documented on the platform, the young volunteers observe fewer plants and birds, and more molluscs, arachnids and insects. The average daily contributions of young volunteers were found to be positively associated with a large proportion of active days on iNaturalist and a systematic contribution behaviour, yet negatively related to a long duration on the platform. This study enhances our understanding of young volunteers’ contributions to citizen science and provides insights for research on participation in online citizen science. Our findings have implications on how museums design the field-based events to encourage follow-up systematic participation and maintain active contribution.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference34 articles.
1. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?;R Bonney;Public Underst Sci,2016
2. Online Citizen Science: A Systematic Review of Effects on Learning and Scientific Literacy;M Aristeidou;Citiz Sci Theory Pract,2020
3. Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue;A Kerr;Soc Stud Sci,2007
4. Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science;F Heigl;Proc Natl Acad Sci,2019
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献