Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Author:

Broeders J A J L1,Mauritz F A1,Ahmed Ali U1,Draaisma W A1,Ruurda J P1,Gooszen H G1,Smout A J P M2,Broeders I A M J3,Hazebroek E J1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Research Unit of the University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Research Unit of the University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is currently considered the surgical approach of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) has been said to reduce troublesome dysphagia and gas-related symptoms. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to compare LNF and LTF. Methods Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and ISI Web of Knowledge CPCI-S) were searched and the methodological quality of included trials was evaluated. Outcomes included recurrent pathological acid exposure, oesophagitis, dysphagia, dilatation for dysphagia and reoperation rate. Results were pooled in meta-analyses as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences. Results Seven eligible RCTs comparing LNF (n = 404) with LTF (n = 388) were identified. LNF was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of postoperative dysphagia (RR 1·61 (95 per cent confidence interval 1·06 to 2·44); P = 0·02) and dilatation for dysphagia (RR 2·45 (1·06 to 5·68); P = 0·04). There were more surgical reinterventions after LNF (RR 2·19 (1·09 to 4·40); P = 0·03), but no differences regarding recurrent pathological acid exposure (RR 1·26 (0·82 to 1·95); P = 0·29), oesophagitis (RR 1·20 (0·78 to 1·85); P = 0·40), subjective reflux recurrence, patient satisfaction, operating time or in-hospital complications. Inability to belch (RR 2·04 (1·19 to 3·49); P = 0·009) and gas bloating (RR 1·58 (1·21 to 2·05); P < 0·001) were more prevalent after LNF. Conclusion LTF reduces postoperative dysphagia and dilatation for dysphagia compared with LNF. Reoperation rate and prevalence of gas-related symptoms were lower after LTF, with similar reflux control. These results provide level 1a support for the use of LTF as the posterior fundoplication of choice for GORD.

Funder

University Medical Center Utrecht Alexandre Suerman

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 247 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3