Laparoscopic Posterior Partial Fundoplication Versus Total Fundoplication in Anti-reflux Surgery: A Comparative Study

Author:

Mohamed Ashraf AbdelazeemORCID,Elian Mohammad Abdulraheem,Abdelzaher Mohamed Abdelaziz,Kamel Mohamed Khalafallah,Abdelaziz Asaad Abdelrahman

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate advantages of partial posterior fundoplication (PPF) compared with traditional total fundoplication (TF). The study included 90 patients with GERD at El-Minia University Hospital between January 2019 and January 2023, divided randomly into group A: PPF (no. 45 patients) and group B: TF (no. 45 patients). All included patients had endoscopic hiatal hernia and various degrees of esophagitis. Postoperative follow-up included satisfaction questionnaire, degree of heartburn questionnaire, frequent belching, inability to belch, bloating, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and endoscopic evaluations. Heartburn improved in all patients (p = 0.000). Shorter operative time was observed in group B (p = 0.007). There is no significant difference in overall satisfaction level between the two groups (p = 0.5). Surgical treatment is the favorite option for the treatment of GERD. PPF has the advantage of shorter operative time and can be safely used with outcomes similar to that of TF.

Funder

Minia University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3