The distribution of competitive research grants from the National Institute for Food and Agriculture: A comparison of 1862 land grant universities, 1890 land grant universities, and other institutions

Author:

Wilson Norbert L. W.1,Walters Lurleen M.2,Wade Tara3,Reynolds Kenesha4

Affiliation:

1. Duke Divinity School and Sanford School of Public Policy, Director of the World Food Policy Center Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

2. Independent Scholar Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Food and Resource Economics University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

4. Rural Coalition Washington DC USA

Abstract

AbstractThis article evaluates the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) competitive grant funding awarded to predominately White 1862 land grant institutions (LGUs), historically Black 1890 LGUs, and non‐land grant institutions. We present the historical distribution of funding for agricultural research. Much of the inquiry centers on the differential funding of the 1862 LGUs, 1890 LGUs, and non‐land grant institutions. We discuss the implications for academic and community stakeholders. Results show that, on average, 1890 LGUs and non‐land grant institutions receive less competitive grant funding than 1862 LGUs for the same award programs. We show that the disparity falls from 2010 to 2019.

Funder

Duke Endowment

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Development

Reference50 articles.

1. Adams S. andH.Tucker.2022.“How America Cheated its Black Colleges.”Forbes Available athttps://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2022/02/01/for‐hbcus‐cheated‐out‐of‐billions‐bomb‐threats‐are‐latest‐indignity/

2. Allison A..2018.“Separate and Unequal: How Lincoln's Land‐Grant Funding Woes Hurt Missouri's Small Farmers.”Columbia Missourian. Available athttps://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/higher_education/separate‐and‐unequal‐how‐lincolns‐land‐grant‐funding‐woes‐hurt‐missouris‐small‐farmers/article_6e3d4622‐1e2a‐11e8‐825d‐6f0c857bd295.html

3. Reflections on Agricultural R&D, Productivity, and the Data Constraint: Unfinished Business, Unsettled Issues

4. The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3