Do corporate sustainability practices mitigate earnings management? The moderating role of firm size

Author:

Rahman Haseeb Ur1ORCID,Zahid Muhammad2ORCID,Khan Parvez Alam3,Al‐Faryan Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh45ORCID,Hussainey Khaled4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Interdisciplinary Research Center for Finance and Digital Economy King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Dhahran Saudi Arabia

2. Bahria Business School Bahria University Islamabad Pakistan

3. Department of Management and Humanities Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS Ipoh Malaysia

4. School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK

5. Consultant in Economics and Finance Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Abstract

AbstractThe majority of the prior empirical literature that inquired about the direct role of corporate sustainability practices (CSP) as a composite construct in mitigating earnings management (EM) has produced equivocal outcomes. Therefore, this study examines the role of CSP not only as a combined construct but also as its three separate dimensions—social, economic, and environmental sustainability in restricting EM directly and with the distinct moderation of firm size that has rarely been probed in the past. Using the data of 255 Pakistani companies from 2018 to 2022, the estimations of ordinary least squares with panel‐corrected standard errors revealed that CSP and its separate dimensions significantly control accruals‐based earnings management, and all these relationships are further amplified by the moderation of firm size. However, neither CSP nor any of its dimensions, either directly or with the moderation of firm size, have a significant role in reducing real‐based earnings management. The additional analysis also validated these findings but only for large companies rather than small companies after splitting the sample based on the firm's size. The findings endorse the stakeholder theory and ethical perspective but oppose managerial opportunism in Pakistan. Besides enriching the existing body of knowledge, this research also offers several important implications for the theory, methodology, practice, and policy.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3