Opportunistic Screening With CT: Comparison of Phantomless BMD Calibration Methods

Author:

Bartenschlager Stefan12ORCID,Cavallaro Alexander3,Pogarell Tobias3,Chaudry Oliver12,Uder Michael3,Khosla Sundeep4ORCID,Schett Georg1ORCID,Engelke Klaus12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine 3 Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen Germany

2. Institute of Medical Physics Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

3. Institute of Radiology Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen Germany

4. Division of Endocrinology and Kogod Center on Aging Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTOpportunistic screening is a new promising technique to identify individuals at high risk for osteoporotic fracture using computed tomography (CT) scans originally acquired for an clinical purpose unrelated to osteoporosis. In these CT scans, a calibration phantom traditionally required to convert measured CT values to bone mineral density (BMD) is missing. As an alternative, phantomless calibration has been developed. This study aimed to review the principles of four existing phantomless calibration methods and to compare their performance against the gold standard of simultaneous calibration (ΔBMD). All methods were applied to a dataset of 350 females scanned with a highly standardized CT protocol (DS1) and to a second dataset of 114 patients (38 female) from clinical routine covering a large range of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters (DS2). Three of the phantomless calibration methods must be precalibrated with a reference dataset containing a calibration phantom. Sixty scans from DS1 and 57 from DS2 were randomly selected for this precalibration. For each phantomless calibration method first the best combination of internal reference materials (IMs) was selected. These were either air and blood or subcutaneous adipose tissue, blood, and cortical bone. In addition, for phantomless calibration a fifth method based on average calibration parameters derived from the reference dataset was applied. For DS1, ΔBMD results (mean standard deviation) for the phantomless calibration methods requiring a precalibration ranged from 0.1 2.7 mg/cm3 to 2.4 3.5 mg/cm3 with similar means but significantly higher standard deviations for DS2. Performance of the phantomless calibration method, which does not require a precalibration was worse (ΔBMD DS1: 12.6 13.2 mg/cm3, DS2: 0.5 8.8 mg/cm3). In conclusion, phantomless BMD calibration performs well if precalibrated with a reference dataset. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3