Can personality disorder be accurately assessed in older age? A differential item functioning analysis of ICD‐11 inventories

Author:

Rossi Gina1ORCID,van Alphen Sebastiaan P. J.123,Videler Arjan C.45,Diaz‐Batanero Carmen67

Affiliation:

1. Personality and Psychopathology Research Group (PEPS) Department of Psychology Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Brussels Belgium

2. Clinical Centre of Excellence for Older Adults with Personality Disorders Mondriaan Mental Health Centre Heerlen‐Maastricht The Netherlands

3. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

4. PersonaCura Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality and Developmental Disorders in Older Adults Tilburg The Netherlands

5. Tranzo Scientific Centre for Care and Wellbeing of the Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology University of Huelva Huelva Spain

7. Research Center for Natural Resources, Health and the Environment University of Huelva Huelva Spain

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe contested categorical personality disorder (PD) criteria are not well suited to inform PD diagnoses in older adults. Yet, the classification of PDs is undergoing a critical transition phase with a paradigm shift to a dimensional approach for diagnosing PDs. No special attention was given to the expression of PDs in older age when the dimensional ICD‐11 model was developed. Given that PDs are highly prevalent in older adults, there is an urgent need to examine if ICD‐11 related instruments are able to adequately assess for PDs in older adults.MethodsThe age‐neutrality of ICD‐11 measures was examined in a sample of 208 Dutch community‐dwelling adults (N = 208, M age = 54.96, SD = 21.65), matched on sex into 104 younger (age range 18–64) and 104 older (age range 65–93) adults. An instrument is considered not to be age‐neutral if a collective large level of differential item functioning (DIF) exists in a group of items of an instrument (i.e., 25% or more with DIF). We therefore set out to detect possible DIF in the following ICD‐11 self‐report measures: the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD), the Personality Inventory for ICD‐11 (PiCD), and the Borderline Pattern Scale (BPS).ResultsDIF analyses using a non‐parametric odds ratio approach demonstrated that SASPD, PiCD, and BPS were age‐neutral with less than 25% of items showing DIF. Yet, impact of DIF at scale level, examined by way of differential test functioning (DTF), indicated a DTF effect on the SASPD total score.ConclusionsThese results of age‐neutrality of the PiCD and BPS are promising for measuring ICD‐11 traits and the borderline pattern. Yet, the age‐neutral measurement of PD severity requires further research. With a rapidly aging population, its accurate assessment across the entire adult life span, including older age, is a prerequisite for an adequate detection of PDs.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3