Internal consistency of measures for ICD‐11 personality disorder severity and traits: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Hualparuca‐Olivera Luis1ORCID,Caycho‐Rodríguez Tomás2ORCID,Torales Julio3ORCID,Ramos‐Vera Cristian4ORCID,Ramos‐Campos Dayana5ORCID,Córdova‐Gónzales Luis6ORCID,Bach Bo78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Escuela de Psicología Universidad Continental Huancayo Peru

2. Facultad de Psicología Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru

3. Department of Medical Psychology School of Medical Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Asunción San Lorenzo Paraguay

4. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Cesar Vallejo Lima Peru

5. Department of Research Psychological Science, Uncanny Huancayo Peru

6. Escuela Universitaria de PostGrado, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal Lima Peru

7. Psychiatric Research Unit Center for Personality Disorder Research, Region Zealand Slagelse Denmark

8. Department of Psychology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractA number of measures and scales have been developed for the ICD‐11 personality disorder (PD) diagnosis, including severity and trait dimensions. The present systematic review and meta‐analysis sought to evaluate the internal consistency of these measures across different populations and cultures. A systematic search was conducted across four databases where relevant studies were subjected to explicit eligibility criteria resulting in 49 included studies and 370 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was evaluated, and findings were synthesized using random effects meta‐analysis. Findings overall indicated that measures of ICD‐11 PD severity and trait domains have adequate levels of internal consistency (α/ω = 0.82, 95% CI [0.81; 0.83], I2 = 97.3%). Aspects such as sample, country, language, format, and measured construct were significant sources of variation. Additional meta‐analyses revealed that some measures performed better than others for certain dimensions. Internal consistency was overall supported across ICD‐11 measures of severity and trait domains. Future research should further investigate the interrater reliability, test–retest reliability and stability, and alignment with interview‐based PD diagnoses.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3