Confounded association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of biliary tract cancer: Result from three cohorts

Author:

He Qiangsheng123,Huang Chongfei4,Qin Xiwen567,Yu Yuanyuan8,Tang Di9,Huang Junjie10ORCID,Kuo Zi Chong3,Ling Yuyao11,Mao Deli3ORCID,Xia Bin123,Li Wenjing1,Lu Kuiqing2,Yang Man34,He Yulong13,Meng Wenbo4,Yuan Jinqiu123ORCID,Pan Yihang13

Affiliation:

1. Big Data Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen Guangdong China

2. Clinical Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen Guangdong China

3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Center for Digestive Disease, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen Guangdong China

4. Department of General Surgery The First Hospital of Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China

5. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Monash University Melbourne Australia

6. Victorian Heart Institute Monash University Melbourne Australia

7. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H) The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong

8. Department of surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong

9. Department of surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen Guangdong China

10. JC School of Public Health and Primary Care The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong

11. School of Clinical Medicine Sun Yat‐sen University Shenzhen Guangdong China

Abstract

AbstractRecent epidemiological studies suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was associated with an increased risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC), however, confounders were not adequately controlled. Our study aimed to evaluate PPI use and subsequent risk of BTC and its subtypes in three well‐established cohorts. We conducted a pooled analysis of the subjects free of cancers in UK Biobank (n = 463 643), Nurses' Health Study (NHS, n = 80 235) and NHS II (n = 95 869). Propensity score weighted Cox models were used to estimate marginal HRs of PPIs use on BTC risk, accounting for potential confounders. We documented 284 BTC cases in UK Biobank (median follow‐up: 7.6 years), and 91 cases in NHS and NHS II cohorts (median follow‐up: 15.8 years). In UK biobank, PPI users had a 96% higher risk of BTC compared to nonusers in crude model (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.44‐2.66), but the effect was attenuated to null after adjusting for potential confounders (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.60‐1.49). PPI use was not associated with risk of BTC in the pooled analysis of three cohorts (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60‐1.43). We also observed no associations between PPI use with risk of intrahepatic (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49‐2.04), extrahepatic bile duct (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.52‐2.27) and gallbladder cancers (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.26‐1.66) in UK Biobank. In summary, regular use of PPIs was not associated with the risk of BTC and its subtypes.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3