Racial and ethnic differences in plasma biomarker eligibility for a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial

Author:

Molina‐Henry Doris Patricia1,Raman Rema1,Liu Andy1,Langford Oliver1,Johnson Keith23,Shum Leona K.1,Glover Crystal M.456,Dhadda Shobha7,Irizarry Michael7,Jimenez‐Maggiora Gustavo1,Braunstein Joel B.8,Yarasheski Kevin8,Venkatesh Venky8,West Tim8,Verghese Philip B.8,Rissman Robert A.9,Aisen Paul1,Grill Joshua D.10,Sperling Reisa A.23

Affiliation:

1. Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California San Diego California USA

2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Chicago Illinois USA

5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Rush University Medical College Chicago Illinois USA

6. Department of Neurological Sciences Rush Medical College Chicago Illinois USA

7. Eisai Inc. Nutley New Jersey USA

8. C2N Diagnostics St. Louis Missouri USA

9. Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California San Diego California USA

10. Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders University of California Irvine Irvine California USA

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONIn trials of amyloid‐lowering drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD), differential eligibility may contribute to under‐inclusion of racial and ethnic underrepresented groups. We examined plasma amyloid beta 42/40 and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid eligibility for the ongoing AHEAD Study preclinical AD program (NCT04468659).METHODSUnivariate logistic regression models were used to examine group differences in plasma and PET amyloid screening eligibility.RESULTSOf 4905 participants screened at time of analysis, 1724 were plasma eligible to continue in screening: 13.3% Hispanic Black, 24.7% Hispanic White, 20.8% non‐Hispanic (NH) Asian, 24.7% NH Black, and 38.9% NH White. Plasma eligibility differed across groups in models controlling for covariates (odds ratio from 1.9 to 4.0 compared to the NH White reference group, P < 0.001). Among plasma eligible participants, PET eligibility did not differ by group.DISCUSSIONThese results suggest that prevalence of brain amyloid pathology differed, but that eligibility based on plasma was equally effective across racial and ethnic group members.Highlights Plasma amyloid eligibility is lower in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. In plasma eligible adults, positron emission tomography eligibility rates are similar across race and ethnicity. Plasma biomarker tests may be similarly effective across racial and ethnic groups.

Funder

Alzheimer's Association

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3