Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among diverse enrollees in the A4 study

Author:

Magana‐Ramirez Christina M.1ORCID,Irizarry‐Martinez Gimarie2,Gillen Daniel L.134,Grill Joshua D.2345

Affiliation:

1. Department of Statistics Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California Irvine California USA

2. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior University of California Irvine California USA

3. Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of California Irvine California USA

4. Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California Irvine California USA

5. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior University of California Irvine California USA

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONUnderstanding attitudes toward participation among diverse preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial participants could yield insights to instruct future recruitment.METHODSUsing data from the Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study, we examined differences among mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups in views and perceptions of amyloid imaging (VPAI), a measure of motivations to undergo amyloid biomarker testing in the setting of preclinical AD. We used linear regression to quantify differences at baseline.RESULTSCompared to non‐Hispanic or Latino (NH) White participants, Hispanic or Latino (3.52 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.61, 4.42]); NH Asian (2.97 points, 95% CI: [1.71, 4.22]); and NH Black participants (2.79 points, 95% CI: [1.96, 3.63]) participants demonstrated higher levels of endorsement of the VPAI items at baseline.DISCUSSIONDifferences may exist among participants from differing ethnic and racial groups in motivations to undergo biomarker testing in the setting of a preclinical AD trial.Highlights Representative samples in AD clinical trials are vital to result in generalizability. We assessed motivations to undergo amyloid imaging in a preclinical AD trial. Racial and ethnic minority groups showed higher endorsement of VPAI items. Differences were driven by perceived risk, plan/prepare, and curiosity domains. Few observations among racial and ethnic groups changed after biomarker disclosure.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3